For those who can only think in black and white, the role of subjective (individual) and objective role in social development are the two things are contradictory. In one side are those who emphasize the subjective role in history, the memorandum concludes that the history-bene made and shaped by a great people; that Leninlah (or with Trotsky, and others) was the only person responsible for the Revolution October and decline; that Hitlerlah which resulted in World War II; that Bushlah that caused the war in Iraq, that the mass and the objective conditions (economic conditions, social relations, etc.) play no role at all in history.
On the other hand are those who deny the role of individuals, those who raised the highest of human nature as social beings who need each other, or the objective conditions that put them above all things. And as a result, they see all of the role of individual subjective as a form of cult, as an illusion propagated by elite thinkers. In between the two parties is their confusion, which because of their shallowness swing from one party (the role of subjective) to the other party (the role of objective). Behind the confusion they will be of historical development, they find a 'compromise' or 'solution' to the problem of objective and subjective role in history, claiming that there are times subjective role is important and at other times the role that becomes an important objective.
The ideas mentioned above is misleading ideas in social movements. From an idea or an understanding of social development, born of a strategy in social movements. Therefore, a false idea will result in a mistaken strategy, too. The emphasis of the role of the subjective conception gave birth to a strategy that does not need an organization to change society, just with a few people are great, or a strategy that the organization formed not need to have a relationship with a class society it represents. On the other hand, emphasizing the role of an objective conception gave birth to a strategy that all social movements are spontaneous, and therefore individuals do not need to consciously activists agitate or form the organization, that organization will form its own mass, that the programs the organization is the result of spontaneous reaction. And for those who are confused, they'll just swinging without any certainty until the time when they were slammed by the currents of history.
The role of excessive cult of the individual and will cut off circulation sustainable social movement. It is true that there are cultural leadership that will be able to encourage the change process and conduct agitation and propaganda agenda in shaping the revolutionary forces. But there is an urgent need for such a large agenda to be transformed in the form of a massive organization. Student government is an effort in creating objective conditions for social change that begins definite steps.
Next, we will observe more about the concept of 'Student Government'. First keep in mind, that our government is typically interpret as an organization capable of organizing livelihood base of constituents. While the 'Government Students' real do not ever do such functions. 'Government Students' only perform the functions of protection, assistance or advocacy of the interests of its members, namely students. Implementation of livelihood higher overall student played by faculty or the university as an education provider. So, the word 'government' is more precisely directed at two large organizations, the university or the faculty as a sub-organization.
On the other hand are those who deny the role of individuals, those who raised the highest of human nature as social beings who need each other, or the objective conditions that put them above all things. And as a result, they see all of the role of individual subjective as a form of cult, as an illusion propagated by elite thinkers. In between the two parties is their confusion, which because of their shallowness swing from one party (the role of subjective) to the other party (the role of objective). Behind the confusion they will be of historical development, they find a 'compromise' or 'solution' to the problem of objective and subjective role in history, claiming that there are times subjective role is important and at other times the role that becomes an important objective.
The ideas mentioned above is misleading ideas in social movements. From an idea or an understanding of social development, born of a strategy in social movements. Therefore, a false idea will result in a mistaken strategy, too. The emphasis of the role of the subjective conception gave birth to a strategy that does not need an organization to change society, just with a few people are great, or a strategy that the organization formed not need to have a relationship with a class society it represents. On the other hand, emphasizing the role of an objective conception gave birth to a strategy that all social movements are spontaneous, and therefore individuals do not need to consciously activists agitate or form the organization, that organization will form its own mass, that the programs the organization is the result of spontaneous reaction. And for those who are confused, they'll just swinging without any certainty until the time when they were slammed by the currents of history.
The role of excessive cult of the individual and will cut off circulation sustainable social movement. It is true that there are cultural leadership that will be able to encourage the change process and conduct agitation and propaganda agenda in shaping the revolutionary forces. But there is an urgent need for such a large agenda to be transformed in the form of a massive organization. Student government is an effort in creating objective conditions for social change that begins definite steps.
Next, we will observe more about the concept of 'Student Government'. First keep in mind, that our government is typically interpret as an organization capable of organizing livelihood base of constituents. While the 'Government Students' real do not ever do such functions. 'Government Students' only perform the functions of protection, assistance or advocacy of the interests of its members, namely students. Implementation of livelihood higher overall student played by faculty or the university as an education provider. So, the word 'government' is more precisely directed at two large organizations, the university or the faculty as a sub-organization.
Second, it is contradictory if the 'Government Students' still depends on the structural authority on it, namely university and / or faculty. This dependence not only on formal-legal point, but up in the areas of organizational infrastructure. The contradiction in the above of course implies a pattern of relationships being forged between 'Government Students' with university and / or faculty. The pattern of relations to be ambivalent or ambiguous. One side of the 'Government Students' mambutuhkan university and / or faculty for its existence. On the other hand, 'Government Students' put your university and / or faculty in the relationship vis-a-vis. In general analogy, we call this relationship patterns as 'hate hate-love' or vice versa. "
'Government Students' refers specifically to the Student Representative Council (DPM) or a similar term and Student Executive Body (BEM) or similar terms. And on the other hand, the Institute is widely Students refer to the Student Activity Unit (SME) or the like and the Faculty Student Association.
In its formation, 'Government Students' especially 'Government Students' IAIIG guided by the spirit of partisanship against the student. Alignments in question is a proportionate rather than partisanship partisanship that blindly. Historically 'Government Students' birth from a condition of concern to the elements of state repression and domination of an increasingly thick-although there are ways and sublime latent student-against the entity itself. This dominance becomes significant considering that the students are middle-class society that has the potential to make social change. No one if for appreciating this entity as the agent of change, iron stock and the like attached to the term.
Assessing the 'Government Students', historically also can not forget the history of Normalization Campus Life / Campus Coordinating Board (NKK / BKK), who was born in the Soeharto era and still valid today. Tragika NKK / BKK is an epistemological claim perseturuan between freedom kebernilaian assessment of science and science on the other side. Boarded the net power at the time, NKK / BKK issued as form-gadingan pemenara students from the reality of life. Students are prohibited from engaging in political acts, in the context of early birth, the students are prohibited from making criticisms of the government or the state. On the other hand, calls for students 'return to campus', as it should be a student learning occurs massive. Meanwhile, to meet the needs of others, formed the Coordinating Board Campus (BKK), whose contents are student organizations formed by the state (in practice carried out by universities and / or faculty). These agencies will of course students who have been secularized institution of real life. Institutions that lie in the area of articulation-interest student talent, nothing more and nothing less. Although, in fact, some agencies already do a particular student ideologizing agency become a tool of struggle.
Birth of an official student organization this geld ultimately have political rights of students to make criticisms of the running of the government. No wonder, if in the early days, many students choose off-campus student movement to channel the talent terpendamnya. Call HMI, PMII, KAMMI, IMM, PMKRI, GMNI, FMN, Gema Liberation and others, as a forum for the articulation of student politics. Secularism became increasingly apparent, between lemabaga intra-campus and on the other side of extra-campus institution.
In the container of extra-campus institution, students can shout louder in voicing their aspirations (college students or society at large). While in the intra-campus institution, students must submit to rule on it, or forced to adjust to the conditions dimaklumatkan. Perhaps, if the phrase is appropriate, students who had two experiences at the same time (active in intra-and extra-university institutions at the same time) will have a double personality. And it can be said, of two personalities, the personality to make criticisms, counter hegemony and the like is a more dominant personality. Personality is defeated submission, obedience, obedience to state authority which manifest through the university and / or faculty.
Double personality, ambivalence has implications in the pattern of what kind of relationship should be built when dealing with university and / or faculty. Outside the campus, it is becoming easier, without overshadowed by many of the rules all the will can be articulated. As a citizen whose liberty is guaranteed by law for the assembly and of association and so on. While on campus, there is authority upon which to build a prison panopticon that always haunt students when and wherever he is.
Demkian little explanation about the concept of Student Government. Hopefully the future will be formulated the concept of Student Government who can push a massive process of empowering students and can read clearly the relation of students, the Institute and the State on a broader level. Because there is a possibility that is precisely the reality that our campus is located in the State policy of repression that are not sympathetic to the institute. This requires serious study and reading.
No comments:
Post a Comment